Evidence Intelligence for Complex Matters
LawLM is deposition intelligence for litigators with heavy deposition dockets. Cited summaries, Case Analysis, cross-deposition, and Case Valuator, with page-and-line cites.
Turn hours of evidence review into actionable intelligence in seconds.
Free credits for four deposition packages, or mix with Q&A. No credit card.
We don’t train on your matters. Security
Topic
Notice of hazard
Witness testified the wet floor sign was not present when she entered the aisle, and that she first saw an employee placing cones after she fell.
Topic-organized. Typically under 20 minutes. Not satisfied? We refund. Cited summaries
After processing, you don’t re-read for the timeline, it’s structured: credibility, key testimony, legal issues, liability and damages.
Timeline
24
Credibility
8
Testimony
41
Legal issues
6
Damages
12
Notice of wet floor reported to front desk
Smith Dep. 42:14–18You asked
What did the plaintiff say about prior injuries?
LawLM
Plaintiff denied prior back treatment, then acknowledged physical therapy two years earlier when shown the clinic records.
You asked
Where do the witnesses disagree about notice?
LawLM
Store Manager places notice Tuesday morning. Plaintiff denies any notice until after the fall.
You asked
Give me a settlement value range with assumptions.
From the record
Expected value
$412,000
Range (P10–P90)
$180k – $690k
Liability and damages scenarios with cites. If the record can’t support a value, we say so. Case Valuator
Input
-
Smith, Jane
ReadyPlaintiff · PDF · 142 pp
-
Jones, Robert
ReadyStore manager · TXT · 98 pp
-
Ruiz, Elena
ReadyEmployee · PTX · 211 pp
Smith, Jane — Videotaped Deposition
Q. Was the wet floor sign in the aisle when you entered?
A. I didn’t see a sign. I first saw cones after I fell.
Q. Who was placing them?
A. An employee. After I was already on the floor.
Engine
Every fact pinned to page and line.
Structure
Extract
Analyze
Cite
Built for litigation. Grounded in your evidence.
Not satisfied with a summary? We refund.
Output
What you get from the record
One record in. Five work products out, each with page and line.
Topic
Notice of hazard
Wet floor sign was not in the aisle when she entered. Cones appeared after the fall.
Dep. 38:4–12Typically under 20 minutes.
Timeline
24
Credibility
8
Key testimony
41
Legal issues
6
Damages
12
Key testimony
| Topic | Speaker | Statement | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notice | Smith | Wet floor sign was not in the aisle when she entered. | Smith Dep. 38:4–12 |
| Notice | Jones | Denies any notice until after the fall. | Jones Dep. 91:3–7 |
Legal issues
| Issue | Type | Summary | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notice | Liability | Whether the store had notice of the wet floor before the fall. | Smith Dep. 42:14–18 |
| Premises duty | Liability | Duty to warn or inspect the aisle after the spill. | Jones Dep. 91:3–7 |
Included with every package.
You asked
What did she say about prior injuries?
LawLM
Denied prior treatment, then acknowledged PT when shown the records.
Pl. Dep. 18:2–9Open the transcript and check.
Notice
Smith: Tuesday morning. Jones: not until after the fall.
Built for impeachment.
From the record
$412,000
P10–P90 · $180k – $690k
If the record can’t support a number, we say so.
More on cited summaries, cross-deposition, and Case Valuator.
Built for the file, not for a seat license
Pay for the deposition you run, not a seat you might not use.
ChatGPT with PDFs
- Fluent answers, hard to verify against the transcript
- No structured case dashboard across witnesses
- Will invent a settlement number if you ask
Seat-license legal AI
- Monthly seats whether the docket is busy or quiet
- Sales calls and onboarding before you touch a transcript
- Built for firms buying platforms, not one matter at a time
LawLM
- Page-and-line cites on claims, open the transcript and check
- Case Analysis, cross-deposition, and Case Valuator on your matter
- Pay per use. Live demo first. No monthly seat required.
Compare: vs ChatGPT, vs seat licenses, vs summary tools.
Built in practice
Founded by a litigator
LawLM started in 2024 after too many hours of manual dep review. Built for the docket, not the demo stage. About
ABA publication
How LLMs are transforming litigation workflows, published by the American Bar Association. Read the whitepaper
Your data stays yours
Private models. We don’t train on your matters. Encryption, 2FA, case-level segregation. Security
See LawLM on a real matter
Explore the live demo, or sign up. Free credits for four deposition packages, or mix with Q&A.
Questions? support@lawlm.ai · Pricing · Security ·